The Evolution from Land to Water is Claimed to have Taken 80 Million Years to Occur
But this Same Change Occurs within a Salamander in Months
According to the theory of evolution, it took nearly 80 million years to gradually transition from water to land, which has never actually been witnessed by scientists. However, these same "evolutionary changes" can actually be witnessed by anyone occurring in a salamander in only a matter of months or years:
This juxtaposition alone should be enough to show the problem with the theory of evolution, but if not, suppose that fossils of each of these stages of a salamander were found by scientists, but salamanders were extinct and had never been witnessed alive. Operating under the theory of evolution, a scientist would conclude that each stage evolved to the next stage over millions of years. However, this would lead to complete and utter falsehood, since neither of these stages are different species, rather, they are all the same species, and each stage did not take millions of years to change, but only months or years. If evolution was a valid theory, it should not be able to lead to such utter falsehood, but because it is not a valid theory which can be truly verified, it can lead to clear and utter falsehood.
And to further the problem, there would be no way for scientists to prove that these were different species or the same species at different stages of metamorphosis, because DNA that is supposed to be tens or hundreds of millions of years old, cannot be examined. According to scientists, the oldest DNA that was recovered was only 2 million years old, and yet the evolutionary timeline easily reaches hundreds of millions of years, which means that no DNA can be examined for any fossils that are used as evidence for evolution. And thus, if they cannot even examine DNA in order to properly differentiate whether the fossils are a single species or different species, then their claim that it is due to evolution is not even valid, since, at the very least, metamorphosis cannot be excluded, let alone any other complete unknowns that could have occurred within their supposed timeline of millions and billions of years.
The problem is further exasperated when metamorphosis has stages which are nothing like the predecessors, such as a beetle, whose grub stage looks nothing like its final beetle stage.
The above stages show just how abruptly changes can occur in just a single species through metamorphosis, which only takes days, weeks, or months to complete. And yet the theory of evolution operates on the assumption that species change gradually over millions of years, and so each new species on the evolutionary tree is still very similar to the one preceding it. But this is pure assumption that is completely disproved by metamorphosis. If nature follows gradual changes as it is assumed to do with evolution, then there should not even be such abrupt changes in metamorphosis especially considering that it occurs in a far shorter time frame of months as opposed to millions of years.
And even the changes in the life cycle of a beetle are little compared to that of a mosquito, who begins its life in the water and ends its life flying in the air, and this only takes weeks to complete!
And yet, the supposed timeline difference between water creatures and flying creatures through evolution are assumed to have taken several hundreds of millions of years according to scientists. And yet metamorphosis can achieve that "evolutionary change" in a matter of weeks.